The Shinsengumi and Mito Han

The Kodokan of Mito Han, one of the great educational institutions of its time, was steeped in the philosophy of Mitogaku (“Mitoism”), the cornerstone of Imperial Loyalism – as indicated by the slogan Sonno-Joi (“Imperial Reverence and Expel the Barbarians”), published for the first time in the school’s charter (Kodokanki). “Loyalty and Patriotism” (JinchuHokoku), part and parcel of Sonno-Joi, was advocated by men on both sides of the conflict leading up to the overthrow the Bakufu – i.e., those who supported the Bakufu and those intent on destroying it. Among the former were the leaders of the Shinsengumi. Therefore, without the Kodokan and Mitogaku it is doubtful that the Shinsengumi would have existed.

I’ll have much more to say about this in my next book about the Shinsengumi. Below is a link to my first Shinsengumi book.

[The photo of the Kodokan was taken in October 2018. The two books on the right portion of the other photo are studies of Mitogaku. The other one is a brief history of the Kodokan.]


 Shinsengumi

Ryoma and Nietzsche: Continuing the Discussion

Though Sakamoto Ryoma was the author of the plan for the peaceful restoration of Imperial rule, he was also a leading proponent of Tobaku, “Down with the Bakufu.” These two seemingly contradictory stances underlie the tragedy of his assassination. In a letter to Ryoma the Choshu leader Katsura Kogoro, using the name Kido Junichiro, likened Tobaku to a “Great Drama,” the final act of which was getting underway in Kyoto in the fall of 1867, as Satsuma and Choshu, in collaboration with Court nobleman Iwakura Tomomi, prepared to destroy the Bakufu. With Ryoma’s assassination around two months later, on the eve of a peaceful revolution of his own design, that drama turned tragic.

Tragedy may have different connotations depending on interpretation; but perhaps its most widely understood definition is based on the tragic drama of ancient Greece. Nietzsche wrote that Greek tragedy reveals that “the divinity often sends men unjustified suffering, not arbitrarily, but to preserve a customary world-order.”[1] And he held that the horror of tragedy is at the root of its enduring allure—the gist being, as Nietzsche’s English translator Walter Kaufmann observes, that the sublime beauty of ancient Greek tragedy enabled the audience to endure “the utter terror and absurdity of existence.”[2] Ryoma was behind a sea change in Japan’s world-order; and his murder—by multiple sword wounds to the body and a blow to the head from which his brains reportedly protruded even as he was still able to move around and speak—was as unjustifiable as it was horrible.

Julian Young, a Nietzsche biographer, wonder “what kind of satisfaction we could possibly derive from witnessing the destruction of the tragic hero, a figure who, in many respects, represents what is finest and wisest within us.”[3] The answer lies, says Nietzsche, “in the tragic enjoyment of the destruction of the noblest,” with nobility being inseparable from sublime beauty.[4] And to this we should add, as any modern-day moviegoer knows, the pleasure derived from the comfort zone between the viewer and the tragedy unfolding before his eyes.

That the tragedy that is Sakamoto Ryoma’s assassination has endured for more than a century and a half as an allure to historians, novelists, and filmmakers—and indeed a wide segment of the Japanese public—is testimony of the truth of these Nietzschean theories, not least the philosopher’s ideas regarding the destruction of nobility, a quality with which Ryoma was certainly endowed. And Ryoma’s death was truly horrible—for how else describe the butchering of a founder of modern Japan at the dawn of a new era as he was about to finally achieve his dream of engaging in international trade to enable his country to compete with the great Western powers—a dream which had it been fulfilled might well have altered subsequent history to such a degree that future Japanese leaders might not have conceived of the need to create a “Greater East Asia” sphere to counter Western power, a policy that was inextricably entwined with the events leading up to World War II?

[1]Young, Julian. Friedrich Nietzsche: A Philosophical Biography. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010, p. 41,

[2]Walter Kaufmann and R. J. Hollindale, trans. The Will to Power. New York: Vintage-Random, 1968, section 1029, note 83.

[3]Young, p. 40.

[4]The Will to Power, section 29.

A Note On Matsudaira Katamori, Master of the Shinsengumi

When Matsudaira Katamori, daimyo of Aizu, arrived in Kyoto to assume the newly created post of Kyoto protectorate (京都守護職/Kyoto Shugoshoku) in the closing days of 1862, there were people in the Imperial capital who did not even know that Aizu existed, Yamakawa Hiroshi, formerly a senior minister to Katamori, reports in his history of the Kyoto protectorate. In his new post Matsudaira Katamori became the master of the Shinsengumi.

[Yamakawa Hiroshi’s book (京都守護職始末/Kyoto Shugoshoku Shimatsu) was published in 1911. This photo of Matsudaira Katamori is used in Samurai Assassins, courtesy of the National Diet Library, Japan. Matsudaira Katamori is also featured in Shinsengumi: The Shogun’s Last Samurai Corps.]


hillsborough_978-1-4766-6880-2
widget_buy_amazon
 Shinsengumi

Kondo and Hijikata Liked Longer Than Average Swords

Both Shinsengumi leaders favored swords of greater than average length. Samurai generally carried two swords, one long and one short. The cutting edge of the average “long sword” measured about 2 feet, 2.5 inches. In the battle at Kofu in the spring of 1868, Kondo Isami reportedly wielded a particularly long sword of about 2 feet, 9 ½ inches. In the fall of that year, Hijikata Toshizo reportedly carried an even longer sword. As I wrote in Shinsengumi: The Shogun’s Last Samurai Corps, during the rebellion in the north, Hijikata, as a condition for accepting the command of confederate troops, demanded that his orders be strictly obeyed. “If any man defies [my] orders, . . . , I, Toshizo, will have to strike him down with my sword,” which he said was nearly three feet long.

[The above photo of the original Miniature Shinsengumi Banner appears in my Shinsengumi: The Shogun’s Last Samurai Corps, courtesy of Hijikata Toshizo Museum.]

 Shinsengumi

Shinsengumi: The Allure of Its Two Leaders

The Shinsengumi was a police force organized in the spring of 1863 to guard the shogun, quell sedition and restore law and order in the Imperial capital of Kyoto during the upheaval of the 1860s. The shogun’s government, the Tokugawa Bakufu, was overthrown less than five years later. That the Shinsengumi was on the wrong side of history has no bearing on the allure of its two leaders, Kondo Isami and Hijikawa Toshizo, in the 21stcentury. Which is one of the reasons that I wrote the only historical narrative about the “shogun’s last samurai corps” in English, and I am currently writing a more in-depth history of the Shinsengumi to be published in the future.

[The above photo of the original Miniature Shinsengumi Banner appears in my Shinsengumi: The Shogun’s Last Samurai Corps, courtesy of Hijikata Toshizo Museum.]

 Shinsengumi